Public trial so says supreme court!!
It quite beats me how discussion and counter discussion in public domain, print, visual, and cyber can be bad. I wish to infer that the supreme court was refering to the appeal against Bayana's appointment to HC and not to the discussions as such. It is the essential spirit of a democracy to discuss and be able to discuss issues of public interest openly and not put a blanket on it. Even on the Clemenceau issue, supreme court put down such guidelines. Is the supreme court trying to gag the public and the media. Dont the citizens have a right to discuss issues of public interest. Will the justices please clarify?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home